Conspiracy Theory or not, ask Putin who claimed US intention of the New World Order. In his 2007 speech in Munich, Germany.

Mutsuo Mabuchi on Ukraine War

According to Mutsuo Mabuchi, former ambassador to Ukraine, Putin knew the US neoconservative faction intended to establish the world government which he had talked about in his 2007 Munich Security conference.
However, the western media did not report this breaking announcement of the Russian president.

Mabuchi, in his YouTube video, asked those who believed he was a conspiracy theorist to see what happened after Putin claimed the US intention of the world government. Since then, the US has interfered with the other nationalist countries, turning them over. Putin decided to intervene in Ukraine to save the Russian residents in the eastern part of the country.

He asked Ukraine not to try to join NATO, which Zelensky did not follow, most probably under the influence of the US neocon group. Putin asked the US to keep the Minsk agreement, which the latter did not.

I read through Putin’s Munich speech. The following passage should be what Mutsuo Mabuchi referred to in order to support his “conspiracy theory”.

Speech and the Following Discussion at the Munich Conference on Security Policy
February 10, 2007

However, what is a unipolar world? However one might embellish this term, at the end of the day it refers to one type of situation, namely one centre of authority, one centre of force, one centre of decision-making.
It is world in which there is one master, one sovereign. And at the end of the day this is pernicious not only for all those within this system, but also for the sovereign itself because it destroys itself from within.
And this certainly has nothing in common with democracy. Because, as you know, democracy is the power of the majority in light of the interests and opinions of the minority.

We are seeing a greater and greater disdain for the basic principles of international law. And independent legal norms are, as a matter of fact, coming increasingly closer to one state’s legal system. One state and, of course, first and foremost the United States, has overstepped its national borders in every way. This is visible in the economic, political, cultural and educational policies it imposes on other nations. Well, who likes this? Who is happy about this?